I’ve had lots of conversations about audience-first fundraising and marketing across the nonprofit sector. And I’ve noticed there’s some confusion around the difference between audience-first and omnichannel.
Some use the terms interchangeably. Some even confuse both audience-first and omnichannel with the tactic of co-targeting.
While these concepts are all related, they’re definitely not the same.
An audience-first strategy will include omnichannel efforts, but not every omnichannel approach is audience-first. It brings me back to geometry where we learned that every square is a rectangle, but not every rectangle is a square.
So let’s take a closer look at the differences between audience-first and omnichannel—and why you should be building toward an audience-first foundation. We’ll start with omnichannel.
Defining omnichannel
An omnichannel marketing strategy aims to create a seamless, cohesive experience across various platforms. The goal is to ensure consistency in messaging whether donors encounter an organization on social media, through direct mail, via email or on the website.
The problem is that campaigns are often at the center of an omnichannel approach, not people.
For example, a summer campaign called “No Hunger Summer” might include coordinated emails, social media posts, phone calls and direct mail—all focused on the theme of ending hunger in the summer, with a unified message and creative imagery. Each donor experiences a well-coordinated theme, but each donor’s experience looks the same.
An omnichannel approach is broad but shallow. It’s generally an effective approach because it allows nonprofits to maximize their reach and provide that consistent experience, but it doesn’t necessarily prioritize the donor’s motivations, behaviors and interests.
How audience-first is different
While omnichannel strategies may reach a donor on multiple platforms, audience-first makes sure the message resonates on a personal level.
Audience-first thinking begins with identifying the groups you want to communicate with and designing an experience that will connect with each segment in the most meaningful way.
Rather than structuring fundraising around campaigns, channels or platforms, an audience-first approach places the donor at the heart of every decision, building long-term relationships by focusing on who they are. It’s a mindset that asks, “What does the donor need from us to feel valued and involved?”
An audience-first approach also requires a unique budgeting process. Instead of dividing your resources across channels, you start by assessing each audience segment and allocating resources accordingly. This approach prioritizes strategic investments in segments with the most potential, then considers the right channels to amplify the strategy within each segment.
Essentially, you’re delivering an omnichannel experience to each segment, but each omnichannel experience is tailored a bit differently.
Going deeper with audience-first
At RKD Group, we follow a framework that lets us break down audiences by factors like the donor pyramid, donor lifecycle stage and generational preferences:
- Donor Pyramid: We prioritize segments based on their capacity and engagement. For example, major donors are high-impact supporters, so they may receive highly personalized interactions, while mid-level donors are cultivated with messaging that encourages them to elevate their giving. Each segment is supported with an experience suited to their level of engagement.
- Donor Lifecycle: Segmenting by lifecycle stage helps us tailor engagement based on where donors are in their relationship with the organization. New donors, core donors and lapsed donors all have different needs. For example, new donors receive welcoming messages to help them connect emotionally, while lapsed donors may get messages reminding them of their past impact to re-engage them.
- Generational Preferences: With a generational lens, we can personalize strategies for Baby Boomers, Gen Xers, Millennials and Gen Zers. For example, Baby Boomers might respond well to messages that emphasize their legacy and commitment, while Millennials might connect better with transparent, impact-driven stories. This approach builds emotional connections that help donors feel understood and valued.
By focusing on these audience-specific factors, we create sustained, meaningful engagement. Donors are met at their unique points in the journey, and the experiences we create evolve with their relationship to the organization.
Conclusion
For nonprofit fundraisers, both omnichannel and audience-first strategies can play critical roles in effective campaigns, but they’re not synonymous. Omnichannel ensures reach across multiple platforms and a unified message, but audience-first goes deeper. It’s about using insights to drive not just where you reach donors but also how and why.
In today’s fundraising landscape, donors expect authenticity and alignment with their values. An audience-first mindset ensures that every engagement feels personal.
In the end, audience-first thinking doesn’t just reach donors—it resonates with them.
Leave a comment: